MiniMax M3 428B · GPU comparison

MiniMax M3 428B — B200 vs GB200 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on MiniMax M3 428B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B200 hits 4781 tok/s/GPU for $0.11 per million tokens at 148 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B. No GB200 NVL72 data at this operating point.

B200: 2210 tok/s/GPU, $0.25 per million tokens at 290 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B. GB200 NVL72 is unmeasured here.

At 432 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B, B200 delivers 849 tok/s/GPU at $0.64 per million tokens; GB200 NVL72 hasn't been benchmarked at this target. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
B200:4780.7GB200 NVL72:
B200:2209.5GB200 NVL72:
B200:848.8GB200 NVL72:
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.113GB200 NVL72:
B200:$0.245GB200 NVL72:
B200:$0.644GB200 NVL72:
tok/s/MW
B200:2795751GB200 NVL72:
B200:1292124GB200 NVL72:
B200:496395GB200 NVL72:
Concurrency
B200:~8GB200 NVL72:
B200:~4GB200 NVL72:
B200:~1GB200 NVL72:

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: