Vera Rubin NVL72 vs GB200 NVL72? Inference TCO & Architecture Analysis
Rubin LUT Based Tensor Core, Feynman, Rack Scale, Perf Per MegaWatt, Perf Per Dollar, Software Improvements, Public Rubin Software, PyTorch, vLLM, OpenAI Triton
Insights on AI inference benchmarking, GPU performance, and ML infrastructure.
New to the terminology? Browse the AI inference glossary.
Rubin LUT Based Tensor Core, Feynman, Rack Scale, Perf Per MegaWatt, Perf Per Dollar, Software Improvements, Public Rubin Software, PyTorch, vLLM, OpenAI Triton
DSv4-Pro FP4 8K/1K, Dynamo+vLLM, disaggregated on both racks. GB300's 50% extra HBM (288 vs 192 GB/GPU) unlocks a wider prefill+decode recipe GB200 can't fit — lifting middle-of-curve perf/$ by 2.31x despite a 20% per-GPU TCO premium.
DeepSeek R1 FP4 1k/1k. NVL72's 72-GPU NVLink scale-up fabric lets decode run wide EP up to EP=32, where B200's 8-GPU NVLink island caps out at EP=8 over RoCEv2
Rack scale NVLink on NVL72 lets Dynamo vLLM run Kimi K2.5 wide EP up to Decode EP 16, taking peak throughput from 4,021 to 12,587 tok/s/GPU on 8k/1k NVFP4