Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Chip comparison

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — MI300X vs MI325X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) and MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 55 tok/s/user interactivity on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, MI300X delivers 308 tok/s/chip at $0.84 per million tokens; MI325X delivers 399 tok/s/chip at $0.77. MI325X is 10% cheaper per token; MI325X delivers 30% more tok/s/chip at this point.

MI300X posts 226 tok/s/chip for $1.17 per million tokens at 68 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B; MI325X posts 285 tok/s/chip for $1.08. MI325X is 8% cheaper per token; MI325X delivers 26% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 82 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: MI300X hits 151 tok/s/chip, MI325X hits 185. Per-million costs land at $1.75 and $1.66 respectively. MI325X is 6% cheaper per token; MI325X delivers 22% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · bf16 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
MI300X:308.0MI325X:399.5
MI300X:225.8MI325X:284.6
MI300X:151.3MI325X:184.9
Cost ($/M tok)
MI300X:$0.842MI325X:$0.766
MI300X:$1.166MI325X:$1.076
MI300X:$1.749MI325X:$1.655
tok/s/MW
MI300X:221592MI325X:236377
MI300X:162454MI325X:168416
MI300X:108874MI325X:109406
Concurrency
MI300X:~23MI325X:~32
MI300X:~13MI325X:~17
MI300X:~8MI325X:~10

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Deployment:
Spec Decoding:
MI300X vs MI325X: Qwen3.5 Inference Benchmark | InferenceX