MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — MI325X vs MI355X
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
Near the low end of the 27–104 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 46 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: MI325X runs 1643 tok/s/chip at $0.19/M tokens, MI355X runs 2214 at $0.19/M. MI325X is 3% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 35% more tok/s/chip.
Setting 65 tok/s/user as the target on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, MI325X produces 757 tok/s/chip ($0.41 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 1371 ($0.31). MI355X is 31% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 81% more tok/s/chip.
At 85 tok/s/user interactivity on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, MI325X delivers 325 tok/s/chip at $0.94 per million tokens; MI355X delivers 710 tok/s/chip at $0.59. MI355X is 60% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 119% more tok/s/chip at this point. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | MI325X:1642.6MI355X:2213.5 | MI325X:757.2MI355X:1370.8 | MI325X:324.7MI355X:710.0 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | MI325X:$0.186MI355X:$0.191 | MI325X:$0.412MI355X:$0.313 | MI325X:$0.940MI355X:$0.589 |
| tok/s/MW | MI325X:971943MI355X:1059100 | MI325X:448067MI355X:655868 | MI325X:192115MI355X:339708 |
| Concurrency | MI325X:~147MI355X:~324 | MI325X:~38MI355X:~24 | MI325X:~16MI355X:~9 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.