MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — MI300X vs MI355X
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
MI300X / MI355X on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 at 44 tok/s/user: 1249 / 2811 tok/s/chip, $0.21 / $0.15 per million tokens. MI355X is 43% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 125% more tok/s/chip.
Around the middle of the 27–95 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 61 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: MI300X runs 779 tok/s/chip at $0.34/M tokens, MI355X runs 1637 at $0.26/M. MI355X is 31% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 110% more tok/s/chip.
Setting 78 tok/s/user as the target on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, MI300X produces 412 tok/s/chip ($0.63 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 883 ($0.48). MI355X is 33% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 114% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | MI300X:1248.6MI355X:2811.3 | MI300X:778.8MI355X:1636.8 | MI300X:411.9MI355X:882.7 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | MI300X:$0.212MI355X:$0.149 | MI300X:$0.341MI355X:$0.260 | MI300X:$0.633MI355X:$0.476 |
| tok/s/MW | MI300X:898287MI355X:1345108 | MI300X:560298MI355X:783155 | MI300X:296322MI355X:422332 |
| Concurrency | MI300X:~63MI355X:~128 | MI300X:~26MI355X:~40 | MI300X:~11MI355X:~22 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.