MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 · Chip comparison

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — GB300 NVL72 vs H100

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

GB300 NVL72 posts 3909 tok/s/chip for $0.17 per million tokens at 60 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7; H100 posts 599 tok/s/chip for $0.53. GB300 NVL72 is 220% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 552% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 79 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: GB300 NVL72 hits 1563 tok/s/chip, H100 hits 353. Per-million costs land at $0.43 and $0.92 respectively. GB300 NVL72 is 113% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 343% more tok/s/chip.

GB300 NVL72 / H100 on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 at 98 tok/s/user: 901 / 207 tok/s/chip, $0.74 / $1.56 per million tokens. GB300 NVL72 is 112% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 335% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
GB300 NVL72:3909.5H100:599.4
GB300 NVL72:1563.1H100:353.0
GB300 NVL72:901.3H100:207.1
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:$0.167H100:$0.534
GB300 NVL72:$0.431H100:$0.920
GB300 NVL72:$0.736H100:$1.563
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:1844089H100:437502
GB300 NVL72:737315H100:257637
GB300 NVL72:425139H100:151188
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~380H100:~41
GB300 NVL72:~64H100:~18
GB300 NVL72:~32H100:~9

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Deployment:
Spec Decoding: