MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 · Chip comparison

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — B300 vs H100

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 / H100 on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 at 60 tok/s/user: 3427 / 599 tok/s/chip, $0.18 / $0.53 per million tokens. B300 is 192% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 472% more tok/s/chip.

Around the middle of the 41–117 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 79 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: B300 runs 1534 tok/s/chip at $0.42/M tokens, H100 runs 353 at $0.92/M. B300 is 122% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 335% more tok/s/chip.

Setting 98 tok/s/user as the target on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, B300 produces 1067 tok/s/chip ($0.57 per million tokens) and H100 produces 207 ($1.56). B300 is 174% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 415% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:3426.9H100:599.4
B300:1533.8H100:353.0
B300:1066.6H100:207.1
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.183H100:$0.534
B300:$0.415H100:$0.920
B300:$0.570H100:$1.563
tok/s/MW
B300:1803650H100:437502
B300:807276H100:257637
B300:561350H100:151188
Concurrency
B300:~195H100:~41
B300:~45H100:~18
B300:~22H100:~9

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Deployment:
Spec Decoding: