gpt-oss 120B · Chip comparison

gpt-oss 120B — MI325X vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on gpt-oss 120B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 81 tok/s/user interactivity on gpt-oss 120B, MI325X delivers 1260 tok/s/chip at $0.24 per million tokens; MI355X delivers 15234 tok/s/chip at $0.03. MI355X is 777% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 1109% more tok/s/chip at this point.

MI325X posts 1076 tok/s/chip for $0.28 per million tokens at 92 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B; MI355X posts 12995 tok/s/chip for $0.03. MI355X is 786% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 1108% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 103 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B: MI325X hits 743 tok/s/chip, MI355X hits 11108. Per-million costs land at $0.41 and $0.04 respectively. MI355X is 1003% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 1395% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
MI325X:1259.9MI355X:15234.5
MI325X:1075.9MI355X:12995.3
MI325X:743.0MI355X:11108.4
Cost ($/M tok)
MI325X:$0.243MI355X:$0.028
MI325X:$0.285MI355X:$0.032
MI325X:$0.413MI355X:$0.037
tok/s/MW
MI325X:745506MI355X:7289231
MI325X:636617MI355X:6217842
MI325X:439654MI355X:5315005
Concurrency
MI325X:~19MI355X:~100
MI325X:~26MI355X:~74
MI325X:~15MI355X:~55

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Deployment:
Spec Decoding: