gpt-oss 120B — GB200 NVL72 vs H100
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on gpt-oss 120B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
At 117 tok/s/user interactivity on gpt-oss 120B, GB200 NVL72 delivers 18899 tok/s/chip at $0.03 per million tokens; H100 delivers 2622 tok/s/chip at $0.13. GB200 NVL72 is 358% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 621% more tok/s/chip at this point.
GB200 NVL72 posts 16438 tok/s/chip for $0.03 per million tokens at 166 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B; H100 posts 1379 tok/s/chip for $0.24. GB200 NVL72 is 639% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 1092% more tok/s/chip.
Throughput at 216 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B: GB200 NVL72 hits 8533 tok/s/chip, H100 hits 740. Per-million costs land at $0.06 and $0.44 respectively. GB200 NVL72 is 641% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 1054% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | GB200 NVL72:18898.6H100:2621.5 | GB200 NVL72:16438.0H100:1379.3 | GB200 NVL72:8533.4H100:739.7 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | GB200 NVL72:$0.027H100:$0.125 | GB200 NVL72:$0.032H100:$0.236 | GB200 NVL72:$0.059H100:$0.438 |
| tok/s/MW | GB200 NVL72:10106193H100:1913517 | GB200 NVL72:8790396H100:1006814 | GB200 NVL72:4563312H100:539935 |
| Concurrency | GB200 NVL72:~264H100:~64 | GB200 NVL72:~2684H100:~17 | GB200 NVL72:~102H100:~8 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.