DeepSeek R1 — GB200 NVL72 vs MI355X
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek R1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
Setting 74 tok/s/user as the target on DeepSeek R1, GB200 NVL72 produces 9466 tok/s/chip ($0.05 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 1767 ($0.24). GB200 NVL72 is 345% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 436% more tok/s/chip.
At 131 tok/s/user interactivity on DeepSeek R1, GB200 NVL72 delivers 3531 tok/s/chip at $0.19 per million tokens; MI355X delivers 418 tok/s/chip at $1.01. GB200 NVL72 is 432% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 745% more tok/s/chip at this point.
GB200 NVL72 posts 575 tok/s/chip for $0.89 per million tokens at 188 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1; MI355X posts 181 tok/s/chip for $2.31. GB200 NVL72 is 159% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 218% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | GB200 NVL72:9466.4MI355X:1767.2 | GB200 NVL72:3530.7MI355X:417.7 | GB200 NVL72:575.4MI355X:180.7 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | GB200 NVL72:$0.053MI355X:$0.236 | GB200 NVL72:$0.190MI355X:$1.010 | GB200 NVL72:$0.892MI355X:$2.314 |
| tok/s/MW | GB200 NVL72:5062240MI355X:845573 | GB200 NVL72:1888059MI355X:199857 | GB200 NVL72:307696MI355X:86439 |
| Concurrency | GB200 NVL72:~3109MI355X:~254 | GB200 NVL72:~830MI355X:~22 | GB200 NVL72:~86MI355X:~4 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.