DeepSeek R1 — B200 vs MI355X
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek R1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
B200 posts 7986 tok/s/chip for $0.06 per million tokens at 87 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1; MI355X posts 7916 tok/s/chip for $0.05. MI355X is 14% cheaper per token; throughput per chip is essentially tied.
Throughput at 158 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1: B200 hits 2053 tok/s/chip, MI355X hits 2139. Per-million costs land at $0.23 and $0.19 respectively. MI355X is 21% cheaper per token; MI355X delivers 4% more tok/s/chip.
B200 / MI355X on DeepSeek R1 at 230 tok/s/user: 1273 / 589 tok/s/chip, $0.38 / $0.72 per million tokens. B200 is 87% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 116% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | B200:7986.1MI355X:7916.5 | B200:2052.6MI355X:2139.3 | B200:1273.3MI355X:588.5 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | B200:$0.060MI355X:$0.053 | B200:$0.234MI355X:$0.194 | B200:$0.383MI355X:$0.717 |
| tok/s/MW | B200:4670252MI355X:3787787 | B200:1200340MI355X:1023603 | B200:744596MI355X:281594 |
| Concurrency | B200:~497MI355X:~254 | B200:~62MI355X:~64 | B200:~30MI355X:~8 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.