Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Speculative Decoding

RTX PRO 6000 FP4: MTP vs Off Speculative Decoding

Speculative decoding comparison of MTP versus Off on RTX PRO 6000 FP4 (NVIDIA Blackwell) running Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Throughput, cost, and interactivity differences across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

MTP acceptance-rate comparability

MTP acceptance-rate implementations differ across inference engines. Points from different engines are not directly comparable on the same curve — throughput and cost at matched interactivity may reflect engine-level differences rather than pure speculative decoding gains. Interpret cross-engine comparisons with caution.

MTP posts 1372 tok/s/GPU for $0.09 per million tokens at 29 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (RTX PRO 6000 FP4); Off posts 974 tok/s/GPU for $0.12. MTP is 39% cheaper per token; MTP delivers 41% more tok/s/GPU. Draft-token acceptance rates determine whether speculative decoding helps or hurts at a given concurrency level.

Throughput at 46 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (RTX PRO 6000 FP4): MTP hits 1082 tok/s/GPU, Off hits 579. Per-million costs land at $0.11 and $0.20 respectively. MTP is 87% cheaper per token; MTP delivers 87% more tok/s/GPU. Speculative decoding trades extra compute on draft tokens for fewer decoding steps — the payoff depends on sequence length and batch size.

Toward the upper edge of the 13–79 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 63 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (RTX PRO 6000 FP4): MTP runs 916 tok/s/GPU at $0.12/M tokens, Off runs 316 at $0.40/M. MTP is 228% cheaper per token; MTP delivers 190% more tok/s/GPU. Gains from speculative decoding vary by workload; short-output prompts tend to benefit less. (Numbers reflect this URL's pinned 8k/1k · fp4 workload — changing sequence or model updates both the table and chart; the table stays pinned to this page's precision, so precision toggles in the controls affect the chart only.)

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: RTX PRO 6000 FP4 MTP versus Off speculative decoding comparison at matched interactivity levels
RTX PRO 6000 FP4 MTP versus Off speculative decoding comparison for this page's canonical default workload.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
MTP:1372.3Off:974.0
MTP:1081.7Off:578.9
MTP:916.3Off:316.0
Cost ($/M tok)
MTP:$0.088Off:$0.123
MTP:$0.108Off:$0.202
MTP:$0.123Off:$0.402
tok/s/MW
MTP:1407493Off:998961
MTP:1109396Off:593735
MTP:939801Off:324130
Concurrency
MTP:~26Off:~16
MTP:~13Off:~6
MTP:~8Off:~2

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: