MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — GB200 NVL72 vs H100 Performance per Dollar
Cost per million tokens of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
GB200 NVL72 edges H100 at 60 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — $0.16 per million tokens versus $0.53, a 239% cost-per-token gap.
Push MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 to 79 tok/s/user and GB200 NVL72 lands at $0.41 per million tokens against H100's $0.92 — GB200 NVL72 pulls ahead by 123%.
GB200 NVL72: $0.69 per million tokens. H100: $1.56. Both at 98 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, with GB200 NVL72 125% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB200 NVL72 $1.86/chip/hr · H100 $1.17/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dollar per Million Tokens | GB200 NVL72:$0.157H100:$0.534 | GB200 NVL72:$0.412H100:$0.920 | GB200 NVL72:$0.694H100:$1.563 |
| Concurrency | GB200 NVL72:~318H100:~41 | GB200 NVL72:~64H100:~18 | GB200 NVL72:~32H100:~9 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.